Heard the learned counsel for the applicant and the learned AGA and perused the record.
The learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the applicant, being a law abiding citizen, wants to appear before the courts below to seek bail,...
Read More
Legalpundits International Services Pvt. Ltd. (LIS) - is a premier internet-based legal and regulatory information service provider. Supported by some of the best professionals in the field, Legalpundits aims to be the foremost legal knowledge organisation in India, delivering a gamut of legal services and knowledge support to individuals and enterprises.
Tuesday, November 16, 2010
Mangal Sen And Others Vs. State Of U.P. - Nov 15 2010
Heard the learned counsel for the applicants and the learned AGA and perused the record.
The learned counsel for the applicants submitted that the applicants, being law abiding
Read More
The learned counsel for the applicants submitted that the applicants, being law abiding
Read More
Montreaus Resorts Pvt. Ltd. & Ors Vs. ASCOT Hotels & Resorts Ltd. & Ors - Nov 15 2010
1. By this order I shall dispose of the present application under Section 151 CPC read with Order 39 Rule 2 and 2A CPC made by the applicant/ petitioner in a contempt petition seeking directions against the respondents from continuing the contempt on a repetitive basis.
Read More
Read More
Balwant Singh son of Santa Singh Vs. State of Punjab - Nov 15 2010
1. Invoking the provisions of section 439 Cr.PC, petitioner Balwant Singh son of Santa Singh, has instituted the present petition for regular bail in a case registered against him, vide FIR No.92 dated 9.8.2009, on accusation of having committed the offence punishable under section 306 IPC, by the police of Police Station Sudhar, District Ludhiana....
Read More...
Read More...
Hari Singh alias Mithu son of Ajit Singh Vs. State of Punjab - Nov 15 2010
1. Invoking the provisions of section 439 Cr.PC, petitioner Hari Singh alias Mithu son of Ajit Singh, has instituted the present petition for regular bail in a case registered against him alongwith his other co-accused, by virtue of FIR No.147 dated 25.8.2009, on accusation of having committed the offences punishable under sections 302, 109, 201, 120-B and 506 read with section 34 IPC and section 25 of the Arms Act, by the police of Police Station Division 'B' Amritsar.....
Read More
Read More
Aurangabad Electricals (P) Ltd. Vs. The Commissioner of Central Excise and Customs, Aurangabad - Nov 12 2010
1) In this batch of civil appeals, the appellants have challenged the common order passed by the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, West Zonal Bench at Mumbai in Appeal No.A/2287-2290/WZB/MUM/2005/C-III/EB dated 20.12.2005.
2) By consent of the learned counsel, we have taken Civil Appeal No.2694 of 2006 as the lead case......
Read More....
2) By consent of the learned counsel, we have taken Civil Appeal No.2694 of 2006 as the lead case......
Read More....
CCE Vs. Bajaj Auto Ltd. and Ors. - Nov 12 2010
1) The appellant, being aggrieved by the order passed by the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, West Zonal Bench at Mumbai, (for short Tribunal') in Appeal No.A/75-78/WZB/06/C-II/EB dated 13.01.2006, is before us in this appeal filed under Section 130-E of the Customs Act, 1962 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act').
2) The issue in this appeal relates to the valuation of aluminum castings manufactured by M/s. Anurang Engineering Co. Ltd.....Read More
In Re: Mehar Singh Saini and Ors. Vs. - Nov 12 2010
Historically, the constituent assembly debates reflect the desire of the framers of the Constitution to ensure complete independence, integrity and fairness in the country's administration. Besides discernibly stating the privileges, functions and responsibilities of the three paramount pillars of the Indian Constitution, i.e. legislature, executive and judiciary, the Constitution also provided three instruments to ensure proper checks and balances...
Read More ....
Read More ....
Ishwar Nagar Co-Op. Housing Building Society Vs. Parma Nand Sharma And Ors. - Nov 15 2010
1. Leave granted.
2. This Appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 28/03/2008 in W.P. No. 474/1982 of the High Court of Delhi wherein the High Court allowed the writ petition filed by the respondent-1 and whereby resolution and order dated 14th January, 1978 passed by the appellant and...
Read More
2. This Appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 28/03/2008 in W.P. No. 474/1982 of the High Court of Delhi wherein the High Court allowed the writ petition filed by the respondent-1 and whereby resolution and order dated 14th January, 1978 passed by the appellant and...
Read More
Pushpa Vanti Vs. UOI and Ors. - Nov 15 2010
1. In this case we had issued notice to the respondents on 17.9.2010 but no counter affidavit has been filed.
2. The petitioner before us in the present case is a widow Pushpa Vanti, whose husband was an army major who had fought in three wars (in 1948, 1962 and 1965) and was decoratedRead More.........
1. Amar Singh, 2. Jaya Pradha Vs. Union of India - Nov 15 2010
Altamas Kabir, J.
1. These two writ petitions have been taken up together to consider whether Rule should be issued as identical issues have been raised in both the matters and identical relief has also been sought for.2. Both the writ petitioners were formerly members of the Samajwadi Party, of which Shri Mulayam Singh Yadav is the President. While Shri Amar Singh was one of the senior-most members of the party and had also held.........
Read More.....
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)